Sacknoff v. Dingley

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Sacknoff v. Dingley

95 A. 549, 114 Me. 546, 1915 Me. LEXIS 31

DecidedNovember 8, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 95 A. 549 (Sacknoff v. Dingley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sacknoff v. Dingley, 95 A. 549, 114 Me. 546, 1915 Me. LEXIS 31 (Me. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Action to recover for rent. A verdict of $32.50 was returned. The case comes to this court on a bill of exceptions by the defendant presenting nineteen separate excerpts from the charge of the presiding Justice as erroneous instructions. The evidence and the charge to the jury are made a part of the exceptions, It will serve no useful purpose to make here an extended comment on each of the •numerous instructions complained of. We have examined them with care and find no merit in any of them. And it is further-to be said that the evidence amply justifies the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action to recover for rent. A verdict of $32.50 was returned. The case comes to this court on a bill of exceptions by the defendant presenting nineteen separate excerpts from the charge of the presiding Justice as erroneous instructions. The evidence and the charge to the jury are made a part of the exceptions, It will serve no useful purpose to make here an extended comment on each of the •numerous instructions complained of. We have examined them with care and find no merit in any of them. And it is further-to be said that the evidence amply justifies the verdict.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 A. 549, 114 Me. 546, 1915 Me. LEXIS 31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sacknoff-v-dingley-me-1915.