Sacklow v. Abramson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sacklow v. Abramson

82 A.D.3d 1077, 918 N.Y.2d 896

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 22, 2011

StatusPublished

This text of 82 A.D.3d 1077 (Sacklow v. Abramson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sacklow v. Abramson, 82 A.D.3d 1077, 918 N.Y.2d 896 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

The Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). The plaintiff established her prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability, and the defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition. Mastro, J.E, Chambers, Lott and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). The plaintiff established her prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability, and the defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition. Mastro, J.E, Chambers, Lott and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 A.D.3d 1077, 918 N.Y.2d 896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sacklow-v-abramson-nyappdiv-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack