Sackett v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

677 F.3d 1000
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 3, 2012
Docket08-35854
StatusPublished

This text of 677 F.3d 1000 (Sackett v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sackett v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, 677 F.3d 1000 (9th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

677 F.3d 1000 (2012)

Chantell SACKETT; Michael Sackett, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; Lisa P. Jackson, Administrator,[*] Defendants-Appellees.

No. 08-35854.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 3, 2012.

Damien Michael Schiff, M. Reed Hopper, Pacific Legal Foundation, Sacramento, CA, Leslie R. Weatherhead, Witherspoon Kelley Davenport & Toole, PS, Spokane, WA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Nicholas John Woychick, Esquire, Assistant U.S., Thomas E. Moss, Esquire, Office of the U.S., Attorney, Boise, ID, Jennifer Scheller Neumann, U.S. Department of Justice, Environment & Natural Resources Division, Jason Walta, National Education Association Office of General Counsel, Washington, DC, for Defendants-Appellees.

*1001 Before: RONALD M. GOULD and RICHARD C. TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.[**]

ORDER

Pursuant to the Opinion of the Supreme Court in Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency, ___ U.S. ____, 132 S.Ct. 1367, 182 L.Ed.2d 367 (2012), the district court's grant of Defendants' motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) is REVERSED, and the matter is REMANDED for proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court's Opinion.

The mandate shall issue forthwith. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b).

NOTES

[*] Lisa P. Jackson is substituted for her predecessor, Steven L. Johnson, as Administrator. See Fed. R.App. P. 43(c)(2).

[**] The late Robert R. Beezer was a member of this panel and is deceased. Judges Gould and Tallman have agreed to remand by a twojudge order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency
132 S. Ct. 1367 (Supreme Court, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
677 F.3d 1000, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sackett-v-united-states-environmental-protection-a-ca9-2012.