Sacket's Harbor Bank v. Burwell
This text of 9 How. Pr. 95 (Sacket's Harbor Bank v. Burwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It is unnecessary for us to say whether in any case we can be called upon to review a decision of the supreme court denying an application to order an amended answer to stand as part of the pleadings in the cause. For if we have any such power, it can only be exercised after a final judgment in the action. No judgment appears'to exist in this case, and neither of the subdivisions of § 11 of the Code of procedure is broad enough to give us the right to review this decision, until final judgment shall have been rendered, even if we have the power to review such an order after final judgment. Upon this last question we express no opinion.
As the appeal, if reinstated, would on motion be dismissed, to grant the present motion could answer no useful purpose, and it must therefore be denied with $10 costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 How. Pr. 95, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sackets-harbor-bank-v-burwell-ny-1854.