Sacket v. Lothrop
1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 94, 1 Cole. Cas. 91
This text of 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 94 (Sacket v. Lothrop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Sacket v. Lothrop, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 94, 1 Cole. Cas. 91 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1800).
Opinion
The tenant, if he would put the demandant out of court, should have entered a ne recipiatur on the quarto die post; not having done so here, it must be considered a waiver. By the rule entered, that the sheriff return the writ sedetite curia, the demandant was to be deemed continued in court from, day to day during the term. Vide Boothe, 92.
So let the tenant be called.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 94, 1 Cole. Cas. 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sacket-v-lothrop-nysupct-1800.