Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Sachs v. Sachs

Sachs v. Sachs

160 So. 2d 528
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 12, 1964
DocketNo. 3847
StatusPublished

This text of 160 So. 2d 528 (Sachs v. Sachs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sachs v. Sachs, 160 So. 2d 528 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to the appel-lee, Nathan H. Sachs, at any time he deems appropriate or necessary, to petition for modification of the alimony allowance specified in the final decree.

KANNER, Acting C. J., and SHANNON, J., and PATTISHALL, W. A., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
160 So. 2d 528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sachs-v-sachs-fladistctapp-1964.