Sachs v. Roseland State Sav. Bank

32 F. Supp. 152, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3312
CourtDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois
DecidedMarch 8, 1940
DocketNo. 14771
StatusPublished

This text of 32 F. Supp. 152 (Sachs v. Roseland State Sav. Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sachs v. Roseland State Sav. Bank, 32 F. Supp. 152, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3312 (N.D. Ill. 1940).

Opinion

WOODWARD, District Judge.

Pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, defendant, the Ohio National Life Insurance Company, a corporation, moves for a summary judgment on the pleadings, admissions on file and affidavits. Pursuant to Rule 30A of this Court (now Rule 7), both parties have filed briefs, the defendant in support of the motion and the plaintiff in opposition thereto. Plaintiff’s attorney has requested that the Court set the matter down for oral argument. As hereinafter noted, the question is a narrow one. It has been ably and exhaustively argued in the briefs with citations of and quotations from the authorities and adjudicated cases. The Court has read and studied the briefs. The Court denies the request to argue the matter orally.

The major issue presented by the admitted facts is as to whether or not the reinsurance agreement of November 19, 1930 is void. As indicated by the findings of fact and conclusions of law this day filed, this Court is of opinion that the re-insurance agreement is void and that the defendant is not estopped in this action to assert and maintain its invalidity. Before embarking on a long and expensive trial, this question should be settled by the judgment of an appellate tribunal having final jurisdiction. If the judgment of this court should be affirmed, it would mean the end of this particular litigation. If, on the other hand, this Court should be reversed, then the major issue of liability would be settled.

And now the motion of the defendant, the Ohio National Life Insurance Company, a corporation, for the entry'of a summary judgment in its favor pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, coming on for hearing and determination:

And the Court, having considered said motion and the briefs of counsel in support thereof and in opposition thereto, from the pleadings, admissions on file and affidavits on file, makes the following findings of fact:

(1) On July 6, 1931 this suit was instituted in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, by certain of the creditors of the Roseland State Savings Bank, a corporation of the State of Illinois, to enforce the superadded liabilities of stockholders of said bank imposed by Section 6 of Article XI of the Constitution of the State of Illinois, Smith-Hurd Stats., the defendant, the Ohio National Life Insurance, a corporation, not being a party thereto.

(2) On July 3, 1935, by leave of Court first had and obtained, the plaintiffs filed in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, an amended and supplemental complaint making the said, the Ohio National Life Insurance Company, a corporation, a party defendant thereto.

(3) Thereafter and on August 27, 1935 the defendant, the Ohio National Life Insurance Company, a corporation, removed to this court the separable controversy against it.

(4) The plaintiffs, on July 6, 1931 were creditors of the said, the Roseland State Savings Bank, a corporation.

(5) The said, the Roseland State Savings Bank, was a corporation organized under the banking laws of the State of Illinois for the purpose of doing a banking business as authorized by such laws.

(6) On July 31, 1931 the Auditor of Public Accounts of the State of Illinois, pursuant to the statutes of the State of Illinois, appointed a receiver for the said, the Roseland State Savings Bank, a corporation, which appointment was later confirmed and approved by the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois.

(7) The said, the Roseland State Savings Bank, wholly ceased to do business on July 6, 1931 and was then, and continued to be, wholly insolvent.

(8) The Calumet National Life Insurance Company, a corporation, was a stockholder and the owner of shares of stock in the said the Roseland State Savings Bank as follows:

203 shares from November 14, 1928 to July 23, 1929.

350 shares from November 14, 1928 to March 11, 1930.

350 shares from November 14, 1928 to July 10, 1930.

100 shares from November 14, 1928 to February 9, 1931.

[154]*154(9) The American Old Line Insurance Company, a corporation, was a stockholder and the owner of shares of stock in the said the Roseland State Savings Bank as follows:

45 shares from March 11, 1930 to February 9, 1931.

350 shares from July 10, 1930 to February 9, 1931.

(10) Prior to November 14, 1928 and up to and including January 11, 1930 the said, the Calumet National Life Insurance Company, a corporation, was duly organized to engage in the life insurance business in the state of Illinois. On January 11, 1930 it changed its name to American Old Line Insurance Company and continued to do the business of life insurance in Illinois. The said, the Calumet National Life Insurance Company, a corporation, and the said, the American Old Line Insurance Company, a corporation, are one and the same person.

(11) On November 19, 1930 said American Old Line Insurance Company entered into a reinsurance agreement with the defendant, the Ohio National Life Insurance Company, a corporation, in and by which reinsurance agreement the defendant, the Ohio National Life Insurance Company, a corporation, undertook, assumed and agreed to discharge and pay all of the contracts and liabilities of the said the American Old Line Insurance Company, a corporation.

(12) Among other things, the re-insurance contract provided that on or before January 10, 1931, “after the approval of this re-insurance agreement by the duly constituted officials of the States of Illinois and Ohio,” the American Old Line Insurance Company shall transfer and assign to the defendant, the Ohio National Life Insurance Company, a corporation, all its assets and property of every kind, including all policies in force, and upon such transfer the defendant, the Ohio National Life Insurance Company, a corporation, shall assume and agree to discharge all the contracts of the American Old Line Insurance Company.

(13) The defendant, the Ohio National Life Insurance Company, a corporation, was never the owner or holder of record on the records of the said, the Roseland State Savings Bank, a corporation, of any shares of stock of said bank.

(14) The defendant, the Ohio National Life Insurance Company, a corporation, was organized under the laws of the State of Ohio for the purpose (among others) of making insurance on the lives of individuals and was engaged in the business of life insurance.

(15) During the year 1930, and during the first three months of the year 1931; the following statutory provisions were in full force and effect in the State of Ohio as a part of Chapter I of Subdivision I of Division III of Title IX of the General Code of the State of Ohio (being a part of the General Code of the State of Ohio of 1910, as amended by laws enacted in 1913 and 1925):

“Domestic.
“§ 9339.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 F. Supp. 152, 1940 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sachs-v-roseland-state-sav-bank-ilnd-1940.