Sachs v. K.W. Realty Group

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Sachs v. K.W. Realty Group

413 S.E.2d 9, 306 S.C. 481, 1991 S.C. LEXIS 238

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedNovember 12, 1991

Docket23512

StatusPublished

This text of 413 S.E.2d 9 (Sachs v. K.W. Realty Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sachs v. K.W. Realty Group, 413 S.E.2d 9, 306 S.C. 481, 1991 S.C. LEXIS 238 (S.C. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

[482]*482ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

Per Curiam:

Petitioners ask the Court to consider “after discovered” evidence in reviewing the Court of Appeals’ decision in Sachs v. K.W. Realty Group, et al., Unpublished Opinion No. 91-UP-022 (Ct. App. filed January 16,1991). We now dismiss the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted, finding that this evidence does not constitute “after discovered” evidence. See Ortowski v. Ortowski, 237 S.C. 499, 117 S.E. (2d) 860 (1961).

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[482]*482ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS

Per Curiam:

Petitioners ask the Court to consider “after discovered” evidence in reviewing the Court of Appeals’ decision in Sachs v. K.W. Realty Group, et al., Unpublished Opinion No. 91-UP-022 (Ct. App. filed January 16,1991). We now dismiss the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted, finding that this evidence does not constitute “after discovered” evidence. See Ortowski v. Ortowski, 237 S.C. 499, 117 S.E. (2d) 860 (1961).

Dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

413 S.E.2d 9, 306 S.C. 481, 1991 S.C. LEXIS 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sachs-v-kw-realty-group-sc-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack