Sachs v. K.W. Realty Group
413 S.E.2d 9, 306 S.C. 481, 1991 S.C. LEXIS 238
Opinion
[482]*482ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
Petitioners ask the Court to consider “after discovered” evidence in reviewing the Court of Appeals’ decision in Sachs v. K.W. Realty Group, et al., Unpublished Opinion No. 91-UP-022 (Ct. App. filed January 16,1991). We now dismiss the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted, finding that this evidence does not constitute “after discovered” evidence. See Ortowski v. Ortowski, 237 S.C. 499, 117 S.E. (2d) 860 (1961).
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sachs v. K.W. Realty Group, 413 S.E.2d 9, 306 S.C. 481, 1991 S.C. LEXIS 238 (S.C. 1991).
413 S.E.2d 9 (Sachs v. K.W. Realty Group) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ortowski v. Ortowski
117 S.E.2d 860 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1961)