Sachs v. Heinig

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sachs v. Heinig

283 A.D. 722, 128 N.Y.S.2d 552

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 1, 1954

StatusPublished

This text of 283 A.D. 722 (Sachs v. Heinig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sachs v. Heinig, 283 A.D. 722, 128 N.Y.S.2d 552 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

—• This action, brought in the Supreme Court, Kings County, to recover $10,000 damages for alleged personal injuries, was noticed for trial for the December, 1948, term. By a notice dated February 4, 1952, the demand was increased to $35,000, and by a notice dated May 6, 1953, further increased to $75,000. On [723]*723May 22, 1953, the case reached the head of the Trial Term Calendar, for the selection of a jury. Due to repeated adjournments at the request of defendants, the ease was not reached for trial before the 1953 summer recess of the court. On July 23, 1953, defendants for the first time sought an examination before trial of plaintiff, by serving a notice therefor. Plaintiff having failed to appear, defendant Heinig moved, by an order to show cause dated September 21, 1953, to dismiss the complaint or, in the alternative, to stay all proceedings by plaintiff until such examination be held. Said defendant appeals from the order denying said motion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Adel, Acting P. J., Wenzel, Schmidt, Beldoek and Murphy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—• This action, brought in the Supreme Court, Kings County, to recover $10,000 damages for alleged personal injuries, was noticed for trial for the December, 1948, term. By a notice dated February 4, 1952, the demand was increased to $35,000, and by a notice dated May 6, 1953, further increased to $75,000. On [723]*723May 22, 1953, the case reached the head of the Trial Term Calendar, for the selection of a jury. Due to repeated adjournments at the request of defendants, the ease was not reached for trial before the 1953 summer recess of the court. On July 23, 1953, defendants for the first time sought an examination before trial of plaintiff, by serving a notice therefor. Plaintiff having failed to appear, defendant Heinig moved, by an order to show cause dated September 21, 1953, to dismiss the complaint or, in the alternative, to stay all proceedings by plaintiff until such examination be held. Said defendant appeals from the order denying said motion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Adel, Acting P. J., Wenzel, Schmidt, Beldoek and Murphy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 A.D. 722, 128 N.Y.S.2d 552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sachs-v-heinig-nyappdiv-1954.