Sachs v. Gun Hill Jewish Center, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sachs v. Gun Hill Jewish Center, Inc.

48 A.D.2d 609, 371 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9585

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 1, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 48 A.D.2d 609 (Sachs v. Gun Hill Jewish Center, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sachs v. Gun Hill Jewish Center, Inc., 48 A.D.2d 609, 371 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9585 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered on April 19, 1974, to the extent appealed from, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, the motion for summary judgment granted and the complaint dismissed. At best, plaintiffs claim is predicated on an oral employment agreement to endure as long as plaintiff lived or defendant existed. Special Term’s inference that the possibility of defendant’s dissolution within a year precludes application of the Statute of Frauds is not the law of this State. (Cohen v Bartgis Bros. Co., 264 App Div 260, affd 289 NY 846.) Concur—Murphy, J. P., Tilzer, Capozzoli, Lane and Nunez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered on April 19, 1974, to the extent appealed from, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, the motion for summary judgment granted and the complaint dismissed. At best, plaintiffs claim is predicated on an oral employment agreement to endure as long as plaintiff lived or defendant existed. Special Term’s inference that the possibility of defendant’s dissolution within a year precludes application of the Statute of Frauds is not the law of this State. (Cohen v Bartgis Bros. Co., 264 App Div 260, affd 289 NY 846.) Concur—Murphy, J. P., Tilzer, Capozzoli, Lane and Nunez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 A.D.2d 609, 371 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sachs-v-gun-hill-jewish-center-inc-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack