Sachs v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.

584 So. 2d 211, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8509, 1991 WL 158558
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 20, 1991·No. No. 91-920·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Shirley Sachs, who procured a favorable arbitration award, was denied attorney’s fees by the arbiters. She filed a petition for the fees, which the trial court dismissed. We affirm that order. Sachs nei[212] ther moved to vacate, see § 682.13(2), Fla. Stat. (1989), nor moved to modify, see § 682.14, Fla.Stat. (1989), the arbitration award within the 90-day period after delivery of a copy of the award to her as prescribed by the Florida Arbitration Code. Furthermore, she did not make allegations upon which an extension of the 90-day requirement could be based. See § 682.-13(2), Fla.Stat. (1989); Carpet Concepts St. Petersburg, Inc. v. Architectural Concepts, Inc., 559 So.2d 303 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sachs v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 584 So. 2d 211, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 8509, 1991 WL 158558 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

584 So. 2d 211 (Sachs v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Role Model Builders, Inc. v. Lanzetta
813 So. 2d 200 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Chatfield Dean & Co., Inc. v. Kesler
749 So. 2d 542 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)