Sachs Quality Furniture, Inc. v. Hafley

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Sachs Quality Furniture, Inc. v. Hafley

41 A.2d 13, 23 N.J. Misc. 228, 1945 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 43

DecidedFebruary 5, 1945

StatusPublished

This text of 41 A.2d 13 (Sachs Quality Furniture, Inc. v. Hafley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sachs Quality Furniture, Inc. v. Hafley, 41 A.2d 13, 23 N.J. Misc. 228, 1945 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 43 (N.J. 1945).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Sachs Quality Furniture, Inc., appeals from a judgment in its favor in the amount of $12.07 and costs. The specification of determinations reads as follows:

“1. The court erred in refusing to grant plaintiffs motion for a directed verdict and grant judgment in favor of the plaintiff as a matter of law.

“2. The court erred in failing to enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff, as matter of law, for the sum of forty-two dollars and seven cents ($42.07).”

As to the first specification, an examination of the record discloses no motion on behalf of plaintiff for a directed verdict and ho refusal of the trial court thereon. There is, therefore, no basis for this specification.

As to the second specification of alleged error in failing to enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $42.07 as a matter of law, this, too, seems to be defective. See Press v. Klink, 115 N. J. L. 475.

There being no question before the court for review, the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI