Sachs (Kimball) Vs. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided November 24, 2021·No. 83802·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

KIMBALL AUSTIN SACHS, No. 83802 Appellant,

vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILE Respondent.

NOV 2 4 2021 ELFLAESET A. BRCINN CLER F "=. PREME COURT

DEPU CLERK

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order setting briefing schedule and hearing. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Cristina D. Silva, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order setting a briefing schedule and hearing, this court lacks jurisdiction

to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990) (explaining that court has jurisdiction only when statute or court rule provides for appeal). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

J.

Cadish

J.

Herndon

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

10) 19479 giteit.

cc: Hon. Cristina D. Silva, District Judge Kimball Austin Sachs Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) I947A 45411n• 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sachs (Kimball) Vs. State, (Neb. 2021).

Sachs (Kimball) Vs. State (Sachs (Kimball) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)