Sachs (Kimball) v. State
This text of Sachs (Kimball) v. State (Sachs (Kimball) v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
KIMBALL AUSTIN SACHS, No. 84243 Appellant,
Vs.
THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
This is a pro se appeal from the “omninus [sic] finidngs [sic] of fact, conclusions of law, and decision on pre-trial motions.” Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from the aforementioned order, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. See Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court
ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
p\irbsh 5
Hardesty
Oo J. Yk. J.
Stiglich Herndon
cc: Chief Judge, Eighth Judicial District Court Eighth Judicial District Court, Department 9 Kimball Austin Sachs Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
Supreme Count OF NeEvapA
(0) 197A < anions 6X
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sachs (Kimball) v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sachs-kimball-v-state-nev-2022.