Sacher v. Association of the Bar of New York

Supreme Court

Sacher v. Association of the Bar of New York

346 U.S. 894, 74 S. Ct. 218, 98 L. Ed. 396, 1953 U.S. LEXIS 1444

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedNovember 30, 1953

DocketNo. 307

StatusPublished

This text of 346 U.S. 894 (Sacher v. Association of the Bar of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sacher v. Association of the Bar of New York, 346 U.S. 894, 74 S. Ct. 218, 98 L. Ed. 396, 1953 U.S. LEXIS 1444 (1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted limited to the following question:

“Accepting the facts as found in the memorandum decision of Chief Judge Hincks, does permanent disbarment [895]*895exceed the bounds of fair discretion, particularly in view of the punishment of petitioner’s individual misconduct as a contempt and the finding that the proof does not establish that he so behaved pursuant to a conspiracy or a deliberate and concerted effort?”

Telford Taylor for petitioner. William C. Scott for respondents. Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of'this application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit granted limited to the following question:

“Accepting the facts as found in the memorandum decision of Chief Judge Hincks, does permanent disbarment [895]*895exceed the bounds of fair discretion, particularly in view of the punishment of petitioner’s individual misconduct as a contempt and the finding that the proof does not establish that he so behaved pursuant to a conspiracy or a deliberate and concerted effort?”

Telford Taylor for petitioner. William C. Scott for respondents. Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of'this application.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

346 U.S. 894, 74 S. Ct. 218, 98 L. Ed. 396, 1953 U.S. LEXIS 1444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sacher-v-association-of-the-bar-of-new-york-scotus-1953.