Saccone v. Maison Marcel, Inc.
This text of 45 Misc. 2d 776 (Saccone v. Maison Marcel, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order of County Court affirming judgment of City Court of New Rochelle in favor of infant plaintiff unanimously reversed and a new trial ordered limited to the question of damages, with $30 costs to infant plaintiff, unless defendant stipulates in writing to increase to $500 the amount of the verdict in favor of said infant plaintiff, in which event the judgment in favor of the infant plaintiff as so increased, is affirmed, without costs.
Judgment insofar as it is in favor of defendant against plaintiff Angelina Saccone, individually, unanimously reversed, without costs and a new trial ordered limited to the question of damages.
The amount of the verdict in favor of infant plaintiff was inadequate.
The disallowance of the claim for medical expenses is unwarranted upon this record.
Concur — Margett, McDonald and Cone, JJ.
Order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
45 Misc. 2d 776, 257 N.Y.S.2d 728, 1965 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saccone-v-maison-marcel-inc-nyappterm-1965.