Sacco v. Rocco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sacco v. Rocco

277 A.D.2d 1012

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 30, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 1012 (Sacco v. Rocco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sacco v. Rocco, 277 A.D.2d 1012 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, entered upon order of the County Court of Rockland County granting defendants’ motion under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and dismissing the complaint in an action on a promissory note dated and made in 1929, unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. In our opinion the record establishes that no payment had been made upon the note for more than six years prior to the commencement of the action, and that no triable issue of fact appears in this record in respect of the pleaded defense of the Statute of Limitations. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, entered upon order of the County Court of Rockland County granting defendants’ motion under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and dismissing the complaint in an action on a promissory note dated and made in 1929, unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. In our opinion the record establishes that no payment had been made upon the note for more than six years prior to the commencement of the action, and that no triable issue of fact appears in this record in respect of the pleaded defense of the Statute of Limitations. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 1012, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sacco-v-rocco-nyappdiv-1950.