Sacco v. Aiello

182 N.E.2d 528, 344 Mass. 755
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided May 3, 1962·Published

Opinion

Decree affirmed with costs of appeal. The plaintiffs have appealed from a final decree dismissing their bUl in equity for the specific enforcement of an alleged agreement by the defendants to deposit funds in a bank in trust for the minor children of the plaintiffs. The master to whom the case was referred found that the defendants had not made such an agreement. No evidence is reported nor is there anything in the master’s report or report on recommittal which would cause us to disturb the finding. Spencer v. Rabidou, 340 Mass. 91, 92. Certain exceptions (not within G. L. c. 214, § 25) were claimed by the plaintiffs but the record does not disclose that a bill of exceptions was filed or allowed. National Radiator Corp. v. Parad, 297 Mass. 314, 317.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sacco v. Aiello, 182 N.E.2d 528, 344 Mass. 755 (Mass. 1962).

182 N.E.2d 528 (Sacco v. Aiello) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

National Radiator Corp. v. Parad
8 N.E.2d 794 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1937)
Spencer v. Rabidou
162 N.E.2d 767 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1959)