Sacchi and Sacchi
This text of 485 P.3d 312 (Sacchi and Sacchi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Submitted March 5, affirmed April 14, 2021
In the Matter of the Marriage of Jessica Le SACCHI, nka Jessica Pratt, aka Jessica L. Pratt, Petitioner-Appellant, and Derek Alan SACCHI, aka Derek A. Sacchi, Respondent-Respondent. Jackson County Circuit Court 095401D3; A173382 485 P3d 312
Timothy C. Gerking, Judge. Jessica Sacchi-Pratt filed the brief pro se. Jamie L. Hazlett filed the brief for respondent. Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and James, Judge, and Kamins, Judge. PER CURIAM Affirmed. Cite as 310 Or App 700 (2021) 701
PER CURIAM In this domestic relations matter, wife appeals a supplemental judgment regarding custody, parenting time, and child support, raising four assignments of error. But wife has not supplied us with transcripts of the relevant oral proceedings, making it impossible to perform our review function. As it was wife’s responsibility to supply an ade- quate record, we affirm for that reason. See State v. Y. B., 296 Or App 781, 785, 439 P3d 1036 (2019) (discussion of an appellant’s burden to supply court with adequate record on which to perform review function). Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
485 P.3d 312, 310 Or. App. 700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sacchi-and-sacchi-orctapp-2021.