Sacchetti v. Sandt

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Sacchetti v. Sandt

64 Pa. Super. 311, 1916 Pa. Super. LEXIS 295

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 9, 1916·No. Appeal, No. 139·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Head, J.,

If the testimony of the plaintiff be accepted as true, he may well complain he was subjected to some harsh treatment by his creditor. There are many injuries of that character which cannot be redressed by a court ad[317] ministering justice according to law. In our judgment the opinion filed by his honor, Judge Stewart, in support of the judgment entered for the defendant non obstante veredicto, furnishes sound legal grounds for the conclusion he reached. It would serve no good purpose to attempt to state them in other or different language. For the reasons given in that opinion we conclude the judgment was properly entered.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Head, J.,

If the testimony of the plaintiff be accepted as true, he may well complain he was subjected to some harsh treatment by his creditor. There are many injuries of that character which cannot be redressed by a court ad[317] ministering justice according to law. In our judgment the opinion filed by his honor, Judge Stewart, in support of the judgment entered for the defendant non obstante veredicto, furnishes sound legal grounds for the conclusion he reached. It would serve no good purpose to attempt to state them in other or different language. For the reasons given in that opinion we conclude the judgment was properly entered.

Judgment affirmed.

Sacchetti v. Sandt, 64 Pa. Super. 311, 1916 Pa. Super. LEXIS 295 (Pa. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

64 Pa. Super. 311 (Sacchetti v. Sandt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related