Sacchetti v. Sandt

64 Pa. Super. 311, 1916 Pa. Super. LEXIS 295
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 9, 1916
DocketAppeal, No. 139
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 64 Pa. Super. 311 (Sacchetti v. Sandt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sacchetti v. Sandt, 64 Pa. Super. 311, 1916 Pa. Super. LEXIS 295 (Pa. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Opinion by

Head, J.,

If the testimony of the plaintiff be accepted as true, he may well complain he was subjected to some harsh treatment by his creditor. There are many injuries of that character which cannot be redressed by a court ad[317]*317ministering justice according to law. In our judgment the opinion filed by his honor, Judge Stewart, in support of the judgment entered for the defendant non obstante veredicto, furnishes sound legal grounds for the conclusion he reached. It would serve no good purpose to attempt to state them in other or different language. For the reasons given in that opinion we conclude the judgment was properly entered.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fenton Storage Co. v. Feinstein
195 A. 176 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 Pa. Super. 311, 1916 Pa. Super. LEXIS 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sacchetti-v-sandt-pasuperct-1916.