Home/Second Circuit/Saccavino v. Churchward & Co.

Saccavino v. Churchward & Co.

177 F.2d 197, 25 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2028, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 3608
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedOctober 19, 1949
DocketNo. 88, Docket 21431
StatusPublished

This text of 177 F.2d 197 (Saccavino v. Churchward & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Saccavino v. Churchward & Co., 177 F.2d 197, 25 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2028, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 3608 (2d Cir. 1949).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case was tried to a judge who heard all the witnesses. The issue depends altogether on whom he believed, and there was no inherent reason why he should refuse the testimony of the defendant’s witnesses and accept that of the plaintiff and his single witness. We should have not the least warrant for holding that the findings were “clearly erroneous.”

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
177 F.2d 197, 25 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2028, 1949 U.S. App. LEXIS 3608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saccavino-v-churchward-co-ca2-1949.