Sacca v. Symbol Technologies, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sacca v. Symbol Technologies, Inc.

270 A.D.2d 236, 704 N.Y.S.2d 837, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2517

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 6, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—In an action, inter alia, to recover a real estate brokerage commission, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Levitt, J.), dated February 19, 1999, which granted the defendants’ respective motions to impose a sanction upon them and upon their attorneys pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 (c) for engaging in frivolous conduct.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The record supports the Supreme Court’s determination that the appellants engaged in frivolous conduct pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 (c).

The appellants’ remaining contention is without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Goldstein and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action, inter alia, to recover a real estate brokerage commission, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Levitt, J.), dated February 19, 1999, which granted the defendants’ respective motions to impose a sanction upon them and upon their attorneys pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 (c) for engaging in frivolous conduct.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The record supports the Supreme Court’s determination that the appellants engaged in frivolous conduct pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 (c).

The appellants’ remaining contention is without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Sullivan, Goldstein and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Sacca v. Symbol Technologies, Inc., 270 A.D.2d 236, 704 N.Y.S.2d 837, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2517 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

270 A.D.2d 236 (Sacca v. Symbol Technologies, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related