Sac & Fox Tribe of Indians v. United States

196 Ct. Cl. 548, 1971 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 21, 1971 WL 3831
CourtUnited States Court of Claims
DecidedNovember 12, 1971
DocketAppeal No. 4-70; Ind. Cl. Comm. Docket Nos. 158, 209, 231
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 196 Ct. Cl. 548 (Sac & Fox Tribe of Indians v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sac & Fox Tribe of Indians v. United States, 196 Ct. Cl. 548, 1971 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 21, 1971 WL 3831 (cc 1971).

Opinions

Per Curiam :

This case comes before the court on appeal from the Indian Claims Commission, and, after considering the briefs and record and hearing oral argument of counsel, the court has concluded that, as in United States v. Nez Perce Tribe, 194 Ct. Cl. 490, 503, cert. denied, 404 U.S. 872 (1971), the court is unable, on the present opinion and findings of the Indian Claims Commission in Docket Nos. 158,209,231 (now under review), to determine if the Commission’s ultimate conclusions as to valuation of the tracts involved are adequately supported by substantial evidence and untainted by legal error; the Commission’s reasoning is too summary, and too lacking in detail and specificity, to comply fully with 25 U.S.C. § 70r(3) and to enable the court properly to exercise its review function; in this connection, the court cannot properly determine, from the present opinion and findings, whether there is significant and unwarranted inconsistency between the valuations (or the theory underlying them) adopted in Dockets Nos. 158,209,231, and that adopted, some nine months later, in closely related Docket No. 153.

[550]*550IT IS THEBEFOBE OBDEBED that this case be and hereby is remanded to the Indian Claims Commission for further proceedings in conformity with this order, to supply more specific findings and reasoning as to the valuations adopted for the tracts involved in Docket Nos. 158, 209, 231.

IT IS FUBTHEB OBDEBED that this remand is without prejudice to the right of appellants to raise again, on any further appeal to the court in this case, any point or issue raised in the instant appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Strong v. United States
518 F.2d 556 (Court of Claims, 1975)
Seminole Indians v. United States
455 F.2d 539 (Court of Claims, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
196 Ct. Cl. 548, 1971 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 21, 1971 WL 3831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sac-fox-tribe-of-indians-v-united-states-cc-1971.