Sabre Energy Corporation, SonCo Holdings, LLC, Van W. Mounts and Edwin Wesley Sano v. Well-Pro Service, L.P.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Sabre Energy Corporation, SonCo Holdings, LLC, Van W. Mounts and Edwin Wesley Sano v. Well-Pro Service, L.P.

DecidedJuly 23, 2015

Docket12-15-00054-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Sabre Energy Corporation, SonCo Holdings, LLC, Van W. Mounts and Edwin Wesley Sano v. Well-Pro Service, L.P. (Sabre Energy Corporation, SonCo Holdings, LLC, Van W. Mounts and Edwin Wesley Sano v. Well-Pro Service, L.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sabre Energy Corporation, SonCo Holdings, LLC, Van W. Mounts and Edwin Wesley Sano v. Well-Pro Service, L.P., (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

NO. 12-15-00054-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

SABRE ENERGY CORPORATION, § APPEAL FROM THE SONCO HOLDINGS, LLC, VAN W. MOUNTS AND EDWIN WESLEY SANO, APPELLANT § COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2

V.

WELL-PRO SERVICE, L.P., § GREGG COUNTY, TEXAS APPELLEE

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM The parties have filed a joint motion to remand in which they state that they have settled all claims in issue in this appeal. Consequently, they request that the trial court’s judgment be reversed and that the cause be remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the agreement of the parties. This court is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Accordingly, we grant the joint motion to remand, reverse the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits, and remand this cause to the trial court for further proceedings in accordance with the parties’ agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B), 43.2(d). Pursuant to the parties’ agreement, costs are taxed against the party incurring them. Opinion delivered July 22, 2015. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(PUBLISH) COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

JULY 22, 2015

SABRE ENERGY CORPORATION, SONCO HOLDINGS, LLC, VAN W. MOUNTS AND EDWIN WESLEY SANO, Appellants V. WELL-PRO SERVICE, L.P., Appellee

Appeal from the County Court at Law No 2 of Gregg County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 2012-1207-CCL2)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and the briefs filed herein and the joint motion to remand for purposes of settlement, the Court having heard and fully consider said motion is of the opinion the same should be granted. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits be reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings in accordance with the parties’ agreement, and that all costs of this appeal are hereby adjudged against the party incurring same; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NO. 12-15-00054-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

SABRE ENERGY CORPORATION, § APPEAL FROM THE SONCO HOLDINGS, LLC, VAN W. MOUNTS AND EDWIN WESLEY SANO, APPELLANT § COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2

V.

WELL-PRO SERVICE, L.P., § GREGG COUNTY, TEXAS APPELLEE

MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM The parties have filed a joint motion to remand in which they state that they have settled all claims in issue in this appeal. Consequently, they request that the trial court’s judgment be reversed and that the cause be remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the agreement of the parties. This court is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. Accordingly, we grant the joint motion to remand, reverse the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits, and remand this cause to the trial court for further proceedings in accordance with the parties’ agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B), 43.2(d). Pursuant to the parties’ agreement, costs are taxed against the party incurring them. Opinion delivered July 22, 2015. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(PUBLISH) COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

JULY 22, 2015

SABRE ENERGY CORPORATION, SONCO HOLDINGS, LLC, VAN W. MOUNTS AND EDWIN WESLEY SANO, Appellants V. WELL-PRO SERVICE, L.P., Appellee

Appeal from the County Court at Law No 2 of Gregg County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 2012-1207-CCL2)

THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and the briefs filed herein and the joint motion to remand for purposes of settlement, the Court having heard and fully consider said motion is of the opinion the same should be granted. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits be reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings in accordance with the parties’ agreement, and that all costs of this appeal are hereby adjudged against the party incurring same; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance. By per curiam opinion. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Sabre Energy Corporation, SonCo Holdings, LLC, Van W. Mounts and Edwin Wesley Sano v. Well-Pro Service, L.P., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sabre-energy-corporation-sonco-holdings-llc-van-w--texapp-2015.