Sabo v. Aurora, Elgin & Chicago Railroad

183 Ill. App. 34
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedOctober 17, 1913
DocketGen. No. 5,777
StatusPublished

This text of 183 Ill. App. 34 (Sabo v. Aurora, Elgin & Chicago Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sabo v. Aurora, Elgin & Chicago Railroad, 183 Ill. App. 34 (Ill. Ct. App. 1913).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Carnes

delivered the opinion of the court.

Abstract of the Decision. 1. Street railroads, § 86*—care required on approaching vehicles parallel with track. Prudence may or may not require that a signal should be given on approaching a vehicle from the rear. 2. Street railroads, § 86*—when not liable for collision. Street car company held not liable for injuries sustained by the driver of a horse and wagon resulting from a collision, where the driver of the wagon was going in the same direction as the street car and attempted to cross the track without looking back and the evidence showing that the street car was funning at slackened speed but could not have been stopped in time to avoid the collision. 3. Street railroads, § 86*—right of driver of street ear to assume that vehicle will not cross track. A driver of a street car is not bound, in the absence of anything to warn him, to assume that the driver of a vehicle will turn and cross the tracks ahead of him.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
183 Ill. App. 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sabo-v-aurora-elgin-chicago-railroad-illappct-1913.