Sabin v. Ames

1 How. Pr. 228
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1845
StatusPublished

This text of 1 How. Pr. 228 (Sabin v. Ames) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sabin v. Ames, 1 How. Pr. 228 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).

Opinion

Plaintiff insisted that the change of possession of the original letter was a trick, to avoid its production on the trial at the circuit, and in consequence thereof, it was too late for him to procure the testimony of Rood at the circuit, or his refusal to attend, so that parol evidence could be given of its contents.

Beardsley, Justice.

Denied theunotion, with costs, for that reason.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 How. Pr. 228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sabin-v-ames-nysupct-1845.