Sabia v. Orange Cnty. Metro Realty

372 P.3d 902, 203 Cal. Rptr. 3d 516, 2016 Cal. LEXIS 4676
California Supreme Court·Decided June 29, 2016·No. No. S220237.·Published

Opinion

**902Dismissed and remanded to CA 2/8. Review in the above-captioned matter, which was granted and held for Baltazar v. Forever 21, Inc. (2016) 62 Cal.4th 1237, 200 Cal.Rptr.3d 7, 367 P.3d 6, is hereby dismissed. (Rule 8.528(b)(1).)

CORRIGAN, J., was absent and did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sabia v. Orange Cnty. Metro Realty, 372 P.3d 902, 203 Cal. Rptr. 3d 516, 2016 Cal. LEXIS 4676 (Cal. 2016).

372 P.3d 902 (Sabia v. Orange Cnty. Metro Realty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baltazar v. Forever 21, Inc.
367 P.3d 6 (California Supreme Court, 2016)