Sabel v. Hults

New York Court of Appeals

Sabel v. Hults

176 N.E.2d 513, 9 N.Y.2d 987

DecidedMay 25, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 176 N.E.2d 513 (Sabel v. Hults) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sabel v. Hults, 176 N.E.2d 513, 9 N.Y.2d 987 (N.Y. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

[988]*988Order affirmed, without costs. The knowingly false statement in petitioner’s 1958 application was sufficient basis for revoking the license granted on that application, and it was not beyond the power of the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles under the circumstances to decline to consider a new application made prior to March 13, 1961. Petitioner is of course privileged to make a new application, which the Commissi oner has previously invited. We pass on no other question. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[988]*988Order affirmed, without costs. The knowingly false statement in petitioner’s 1958 application was sufficient basis for revoking the license granted on that application, and it was not beyond the power of the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles under the circumstances to decline to consider a new application made prior to March 13, 1961. Petitioner is of course privileged to make a new application, which the Commissi oner has previously invited. We pass on no other question. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

176 N.E.2d 513, 9 N.Y.2d 987, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sabel-v-hults-ny-1961.