Sabbia v. Shinseki

370 F. App'x 101
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sabbia v. Shinseki. Read the opinion of the Court — 370 F. App'x 102
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided March 23, 2010·No. No. 2010-7025·Published

Opinion

ON MOTION

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Secretary of Veterans Affairs moves to dismiss Dominic Sabbia’s appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims’ judgment in Sabbia v. Shinseki, 09-697, for lack of jurisdiction.

t On February 24, 2009, Sabbia filed a notice of appeal with the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. Sabbia asserted that he was seeking review of a February 19, 2009 Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. The Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims held that the Board had not issued a February 19, 2009 decision and that therefore it lacked jurisdiction over Sabbia’s appeal. 38 U.S.C. § 7266(a). Although that court had not entered judgment by the date that the court received Sabbia’s notice of appeal seeking review by this court, it treated the document as filed on the date that it entered judgment, i.e., August 11, 2009.

Under 38 U.S.C. § 7292, this court has limited jurisdiction over appeals from decisions of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. See Forshey v. Principi, 284 F.3d 1335, 1338 (Fed.Cir.2002) (en banc). This court “may not review (A) a challenge to a factual determination, or (B) a challenge to a law or regulation as applied to the facts of a particular case.” 38 U.S.C. § 7292(d)(2).

The issue in this case is whether the Board of Veterans’ Appeals had issued a final decision. That issue is a factual issue beyond this court’s jurisdiction. Thus, this appeal must be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sabbia v. Shinseki, 370 F. App'x 101 (Fed. Cir. 2010).

370 F. App'x 101 (Sabbia v. Shinseki) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related