Sabatino v. Roebling Construction Co.

143 A.D. 955
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sabatino v. Roebling Construction Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 136 A.D. 217

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concurred, except Kruse, J., who dissented upon the ground that the lowering of the elevator was a detail of the work, and that the notice of claim and evidence in support thereof were insufficient to establish negligent superintendence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sabatino v. Roebling Construction Co., 143 A.D. 955 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).

143 A.D. 955 (Sabatino v. Roebling Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.