Sabatino v. Onondaga Wholesale Grocery Corp.
This text of 16 A.D.2d 865 (Sabatino v. Onondaga Wholesale Grocery Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously reversed, without costs of this appeal to any party and motion denied, without costs, without prejudice to an application under rule 122 of the Rules of Civil Practice upon appropriate papers. Memorandum: The application herein was made under the wrong section of the Civil Practice Act and rules and the papers were insufficient in any event. (Appeal from order of Onondaga Special Term, granting plaintiff’s motion for an order of discovery and inspection to enable plaintiff to draft a complaint.) Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, Halpern, McClusky and Henry, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
16 A.D.2d 865, 228 N.Y.S.2d 338, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sabatino-v-onondaga-wholesale-grocery-corp-nyappdiv-1962.