Sabatino v. Herman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sabatino v. Herman

19 A.D.2d 551, 240 N.Y.S.2d 881, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3747

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 20, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 19 A.D.2d 551 (Sabatino v. Herman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sabatino v. Herman, 19 A.D.2d 551, 240 N.Y.S.2d 881, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3747 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for injury to person and property, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered October 10, 1962 after trial, upon a jury’s verdict in the plaintiff’s favor for $6,500. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, unless, within 30 days after entry of the order hereon, plaintiff shall file and serve a written stipulation consenting to reduce to $4,000 the amount of the verdict in his favor-, in which event the judgment, as so reduced, is affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, upon this record, $4,000 is ample compensation for the damages which were proved. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for injury to person and property, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered October 10, 1962 after trial, upon a jury’s verdict in the plaintiff’s favor for $6,500. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, unless, within 30 days after entry of the order hereon, plaintiff shall file and serve a written stipulation consenting to reduce to $4,000 the amount of the verdict in his favor-, in which event the judgment, as so reduced, is affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, upon this record, $4,000 is ample compensation for the damages which were proved. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 A.D.2d 551, 240 N.Y.S.2d 881, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3747, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sabatino-v-herman-nyappdiv-1963.