Sabatino v. Emeana

Second Circuit

Sabatino v. Emeana

13 F. App'x 36

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJune 20, 2001

DocketDocket No. 00-9111

StatusPublished

This text of 13 F. App'x 36 (Sabatino v. Emeana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sabatino v. Emeana, 13 F. App'x 36 (2d Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

Bonaface Emeana appeals from a default judgment entered against him in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Gold, M.J.). We find no error in the entry of the default judgment. Emeana failed to appear for trial and failed to provide discovery demanded to test whether his claim of medical emergency was legitimate.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

Bonaface Emeana appeals from a default judgment entered against him in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Gold, M.J.). We find no error in the entry of the default judgment. Emeana failed to appear for trial and failed to provide discovery demanded to test whether his claim of medical emergency was legitimate.

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 F. App'x 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sabatino-v-emeana-ca2-2001.