Sabatini v. General Electric Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sabatini v. General Electric Co.

69 A.D.2d 856, 415 N.Y.S.2d 628, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11553

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 16, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 69 A.D.2d 856 (Sabatini v. General Electric Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sabatini v. General Electric Co., 69 A.D.2d 856, 415 N.Y.S.2d 628, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11553 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated March 28, 1978, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion to increase the ad damnum clause in the complaint (a) on behalf of the injured plaintiff husband from $5,000,000 to $10,000,000, and (b) on behalf of the plaintiff wife, for loss of services and consortium, from $500,000 to $2,000,000. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and motion denied. In our opinion the original amounts demanded in the ad damnum clauses are sufficient (see Harris v Village of [857]*857East Hills, 50 AD2d 921; Burroughs v East Hudson Parkway Auth., 37 AD2d 836). Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Titone and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated March 28, 1978, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion to increase the ad damnum clause in the complaint (a) on behalf of the injured plaintiff husband from $5,000,000 to $10,000,000, and (b) on behalf of the plaintiff wife, for loss of services and consortium, from $500,000 to $2,000,000. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and motion denied. In our opinion the original amounts demanded in the ad damnum clauses are sufficient (see Harris v Village of [857]*857East Hills, 50 AD2d 921; Burroughs v East Hudson Parkway Auth., 37 AD2d 836). Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Titone and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

69 A.D.2d 856, 415 N.Y.S.2d 628, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11553, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sabatini-v-general-electric-co-nyappdiv-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack