Sabat v. Sabat

72 A.D.2d 585, 421 N.Y.S.2d 18, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13685
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 22, 1979·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to article 4 of the Family Court Act, the petitioner wife appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated November 28, 1978, which dismissed her application for custody and support and granted her visitation with the parties’ children who reside with their father. Order reversed, on the law, with costs and proceeding remitted to the Family Court for a new hearing and determination on all issues, in accordance herewith. The Family Court proceeded to determine custody without advising appellant of her rights to counsel, to an adjournment to confer with counsel, and to have counsel assigned if she were financially unable to obtain the same. This was reversible error. (See Family Ct Act, § 262, subd [a], par [v]; cf. Garrow v Garrow, 61 AD2d 887.) Titone, J. P., O’Connor, Lazer and Mangano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sabat v. Sabat, 72 A.D.2d 585, 421 N.Y.S.2d 18, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13685 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

72 A.D.2d 585 (Sabat v. Sabat) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ford v. Tindal
24 A.D.3d 664 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Hall v. Ladson
18 A.D.3d 753 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Perez v. Arebalo
13 A.D.3d 85 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Machado v. Del Villar
299 A.D.2d 361 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Mahoney v. Doring
256 A.D.2d 1112 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Patricia L. v. Steven L.
119 A.D.2d 221 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)