Sabal v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sabal v. State

608 So. 2d 119, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11472, 1992 WL 316381

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 4, 1992

DocketNo. 91-1537

StatusPublished

This text of 608 So. 2d 119 (Sabal v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sabal v. State, 608 So. 2d 119, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11472, 1992 WL 316381 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence finding there was sufficient evidence presented by the state inconsistent with appellant’s hypothesis of innocence to overcome the motion for judgment of acquittal. See State v. Law, 559 So.2d 187 (Fla.1989). We consider Grover v. State, 581 So.2d 1379 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), factually distinguishable. We find no error in the remaining points on appeal.

DELL, WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence finding there was sufficient evidence presented by the state inconsistent with appellant’s hypothesis of innocence to overcome the motion for judgment of acquittal. See State v. Law, 559 So.2d 187 (Fla.1989). We consider Grover v. State, 581 So.2d 1379 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), factually distinguishable. We find no error in the remaining points on appeal.

DELL, WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

608 So. 2d 119, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11472, 1992 WL 316381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sabal-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack