Saback v. Saback

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Saback v. Saback

651 A.2d 1221, 1994 R.I. LEXIS 278, 1994 WL 664932

CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island

DecidedOctober 20, 1994

DocketNo. 93-505-Appeal

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 651 A.2d 1221 (Saback v. Saback) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Saback v. Saback, 651 A.2d 1221, 1994 R.I. LEXIS 278, 1994 WL 664932 (R.I. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This case came before a hearing panel of this court for oral argument October 18, 1994, pursuant to an order that had directed both parties to appear in order to show cause why this appeal should not be summarily decided.

The defendant, Gabriel Saback, has appealed from a Family Court order requiring him to pay the attorney’s fees of the plaintiff, Theresa Saback. After hearing the arguments of counsel and examining the memo-randa filed by the parties, we conclude that cause has not been shown and that the issues raised by this appeal should be summarily decided.

It appears that the trial justice certainly had the power to award counsel fees even though one of the parties was deceased. Centazzo v. Centazzo, 556 A.2d 560 (R.I.1989). However, the counsel fee was ordered by the trial justice without analyzing or examining the ability of each party to pay. [1222]*1222There was no consideration of the extent of plaintiffs assets at the time of her death.

Consequently, this case is remanded to the Family Court with directions to consider the ability of each party to pay counsel fees. Whereupon an order respecting counsel fees may be issued in the discretion of the trial justice.

MURRAY, J., did not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI