Saavedra Riquelme v. Sancho Bonet

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico

Saavedra Riquelme v. Sancho Bonet

43 P.R. 277

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico·Decided March 30, 1932·No. No. 54·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice Wole

delivered the opiuiou of the Court.

For the reasons assigned in • the ease of Saavedra v. District Court, mandamus, ante, page 274, we feel bound, to hold that Judge Sancho Bonet had no authority to act, and therefore an order will issue to him prohibiting him from act[278] ing in the case of Adolfo Saavedra Solá et ux. v. Augusto Saavedra Riquelme et ux., No. 9,305, to which the petition in this case refers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Wole

delivered the opiuiou of the Court.

For the reasons assigned in • the ease of Saavedra v. District Court, mandamus, ante, page 274, we feel bound, to hold that Judge Sancho Bonet had no authority to act, and therefore an order will issue to him prohibiting him from act[278] ing in the case of Adolfo Saavedra Solá et ux. v. Augusto Saavedra Riquelme et ux., No. 9,305, to which the petition in this case refers.

Saavedra Riquelme v. Sancho Bonet, 43 P.R. 277 (prsupreme 1932).

Pincite

43 P.R. 277 (Saavedra Riquelme v. Sancho Bonet) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.