Saavedra Riquelme v. Sancho Bonet

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico

Saavedra Riquelme v. Sancho Bonet

43 P.R. 277

CourtSupreme Court of Puerto Rico

DecidedMarch 30, 1932

DocketNo. 54

StatusPublished

This text of 43 P.R. 277 (Saavedra Riquelme v. Sancho Bonet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Puerto Rico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Saavedra Riquelme v. Sancho Bonet, 43 P.R. 277 (prsupreme 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Wole

delivered the opiuiou of the Court.

For the reasons assigned in • the ease of Saavedra v. District Court, mandamus, ante, page 274, we feel bound, to hold that Judge Sancho Bonet had no authority to act, and therefore an order will issue to him prohibiting him from act[278]*278ing in the case of Adolfo Saavedra Solá et ux. v. Augusto Saavedra Riquelme et ux., No. 9,305, to which the petition in this case refers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Wole

delivered the opiuiou of the Court.

For the reasons assigned in • the ease of Saavedra v. District Court, mandamus, ante, page 274, we feel bound, to hold that Judge Sancho Bonet had no authority to act, and therefore an order will issue to him prohibiting him from act[278]*278ing in the case of Adolfo Saavedra Solá et ux. v. Augusto Saavedra Riquelme et ux., No. 9,305, to which the petition in this case refers.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

43 P.R. 277, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saavedra-riquelme-v-sancho-bonet-prsupreme-1932.