Saab v. Farah
771 N.W.2d 750
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Saab v. Farah. Read the opinion of the Court — 764 N.W.2d 576 →
Opinion
Ghassan M. SAAB, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellee/Cross-Appellant,
v.
Alice FARAH, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
Order
On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's May 8, 2009 *751 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
CORRIGAN, J., would grant the motion for reconsideration.
MARKMAN, J., would grant the motion for reconsideration and, on reconsideration, would reverse for the reasons set forth in his dissenting statement in this case, 483 Mich. 1006, 764 N.W.2d 576 (2009).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Saab v. Farah, 771 N.W.2d 750 (Mich. 2009).
771 N.W.2d 750 (Saab v. Farah) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.