S.A. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

S.A. v. State

816 So. 2d 1201, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6902, 2002 WL 1021665

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 22, 2002

DocketNo. 4D01-3091

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 816 So. 2d 1201 (S.A. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

S.A. v. State, 816 So. 2d 1201, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6902, 2002 WL 1021665 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

S.A., a child, challenges the final judgment adjudicating her delinquent of grand theft (count I), criminal mischief in excess of $1,000 (count II), and burglary of a conveyance (count III). She contends that, at the plea hearing, the trial court fundamentally erred in failing to adequately inquire into her waiver of her right to counsel as required by Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.165(b)(2).¹ Based on the supreme court’s previous discussion and holding in State v. T.G., 800 So.2d 204, 213 (Fla.2001), we agree and hereby reverse S.A.’s commitment and remand for a new plea hearing. See also T.M. v. State, 811 So.2d 837, 839 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)(re-versing for failure to conduct proper inquiry into waiver of counsel).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

POLEN, C.J., STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

S.A., a child, challenges the final judgment adjudicating her delinquent of grand theft (count I), criminal mischief in excess of $1,000 (count II), and burglary of a conveyance (count III). She contends that, at the plea hearing, the trial court fundamentally erred in failing to adequately inquire into her waiver of her right to counsel as required by Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.165(b)(2).¹ Based on the supreme court’s previous discussion and holding in State v. T.G., 800 So.2d 204, 213 (Fla.2001), we agree and hereby reverse S.A.’s commitment and remand for a new plea hearing. See also T.M. v. State, 811 So.2d 837, 839 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)(re-versing for failure to conduct proper inquiry into waiver of counsel).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

POLEN, C.J., STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

816 So. 2d 1201, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6902, 2002 WL 1021665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sa-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack