S.A. v. State

458 So. 2d 405, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2366, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15798
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 6, 1984·No. No. 83-2269·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Smith v. State, 441 So.2d 1162 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983), pet. for rev. granted, No. 64,678 (Fla.1984); State v. Cruz, 426 So.2d 1308 (Fla. 2d DCA), pet. for rev. granted, No. 63,451 (Fla.1983). But see State v. Holliday, 431 So.2d 309 (Fla. 1st DCA), pet. for rev. granted, No. 63,832 (Fla.1983); State v. Casper, 417 So.2d 263 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

S.A. v. State, 458 So. 2d 405, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2366, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15798 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

458 So. 2d 405 (S.A. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Holliday
431 So. 2d 309 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
State v. Cruz
426 So. 2d 1308 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
State v. Casper
417 So. 2d 263 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
Smith v. State
441 So. 2d 1162 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)