S. & W. Waldbahm, Inc. v. Oetjen
This text of 264 A.D. 837 (S. & W. Waldbahm, Inc. v. Oetjen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously modified by allowing examination of the defendant Mabel F. Oetjen with respect to items 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 16 and 20 of the notice of motion; and by allowing examination of the defendant Samuel Gruber with respect to items 2, 4, 10, 28 and 29 of the notice of motion, and as so modified affirmed. No opinion. The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
264 A.D. 837, 35 N.Y.S.2d 755, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4936, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/s-w-waldbahm-inc-v-oetjen-nyappdiv-1942.