S. V. Thompson Co. v. Goldman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

S. V. Thompson Co. v. Goldman

51 Pa. Super. 632, 1912 Pa. Super. LEXIS 271

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 14, 1912

DocketAppeal, No. 102

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 51 Pa. Super. 632 (S. V. Thompson Co. v. Goldman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

S. V. Thompson Co. v. Goldman, 51 Pa. Super. 632, 1912 Pa. Super. LEXIS 271 (Pa. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Head, J.,

The facts out of which this controversy arises were fully stated when the case was formerly here, 41 Pa. Superior Ct. 209. When, as a result of that appeal, the case was retried, the court below entered a compulsory nonsuit. In the opinion filed refusing to take off that nonsuit, the learned trial judge has again fully discussed the testimony as well as the controlling principles of law. We can see nothing of value to be added to that opinion. Having carefully reviewed the entire record, we have all reached the conclusion that the case was properly tried and that the' resulting judgment should not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Head, J.,

The facts out of which this controversy arises were fully stated when the case was formerly here, 41 Pa. Superior Ct. 209. When, as a result of that appeal, the case was retried, the court below entered a compulsory nonsuit. In the opinion filed refusing to take off that nonsuit, the learned trial judge has again fully discussed the testimony as well as the controlling principles of law. We can see nothing of value to be added to that opinion. Having carefully reviewed the entire record, we have all reached the conclusion that the case was properly tried and that the' resulting judgment should not be disturbed.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 Pa. Super. 632, 1912 Pa. Super. LEXIS 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/s-v-thompson-co-v-goldman-pasuperct-1912.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack