S. v. . Pilkerton

41 S.E. 1037, 130 N.C. 740
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 5, 1902·Published

Opinion

For the reasons set out in S. v. Briggs, ante, 693, there was error in the judgment of the court below, and there must be a new trial.

Reversed.

DOUGLAS, J., dissenting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

S. v. . Pilkerton, 41 S.E. 1037, 130 N.C. 740 (N.C. 1902).

41 S.E. 1037 (S. v. . Pilkerton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.