S. v. Dover
This text of 61 S.E.2d 63 (S. v. Dover) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeals by defendants from Armstrong, J., April 25th Term, 1949, of Gaston. Motion of State in each case to dismiss the appeals granted for that (1) The case on appeal does not clearly state and number the exceptions as required by Rule 21 and by G.S. 1-282; (2) The brief does not comply with Rule 27% requiring the appellant to state the questions involved on the appeal in such a way as to enable .the Court “to obtain an immediate view and grasp of the nature of the controversy.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
61 S.E.2d 63, 231 N.C. 735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/s-v-dover-nc-1949.