S. v. Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield

W.D. North Carolina

S. v. Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina

DecidedMarch 10, 2023

Docket1:23-cv-00060

StatusUnknown

This text of S. v. Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield (S. v. Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

S. v. Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield, (W.D.N.C. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION 1:23-cv-00060-MOC-WCM

T.S., and J.S., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) ORDER ) ANTHEM BLUE CROSS BLUE ) SHIELD, and the ) DELOITTE LLP GROUP ) INSURANCE PLAN, ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________ )

This matter is before the Court for case management purposes. On March 24, 2022, Plaintiffs T.S. and J.S. filed their Complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Utah, seeking to recover benefits under an employee benefit plan. Doc. 1. The case was transferred to this district on March 8, 2023. Rule 10 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that the title of a complaint “name all the parties….” Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(a). The Fourth Circuit has recognized that “in exceptional circumstances, compelling concerns relating to personal privacy or confidentiality may warrant some degree of anonymity in judicial proceedings, including use of a pseudonym.” Doe v. Public Citizen, 749 F.3d 246, 273 (4th Cir. 2014); see also John Doe v. Lees-McRae College, et_al., No. 1:20-CV-00105-MR, 2021 WL 2673050, at *6 (W.D.N.C. June 29, 2021) (describing the analysis when a party seeks leave to proceed anonymously). In addition, Rule 5.2 allows minors to be referred to by their initials. F.R.C.P. 5.2(a). Here, the Complaint indicates that T.S. is the mother of J.S., but the pleading does not provide the full name of T.S. and this information is not otherwise immediately apparent from other portions of the record. Similarly, the Complaint does not state whether J.S. is, in fact, a minor at this time. In order to ensure compliance with the Rules, and to assist the Court with any necessary conflict screening, Plaintiffs will be directed to submit additional information in this regard. Specifically, Plaintiffs are DIRECTED TO FILE, on or before March 24, 2023, either: (1) a Notice setting forth the full

name of “T.S.” (and the full name of “J.S.” if she is not a minor), or (2) a Motion for Leave to Proceed Anonymously, with a supporting brief, along with a Notice, which may be filed under seal, setting forth the full name of “T.S.” (and the full name of “J.S.” if she is not a minor). It 1s so ordered.

Signed: March 10, 2023

W. Carleton Metcalf iy United States Magistrate Judge + AM J

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION 1:23-cv-00060-MOC-WCM

T.S., and J.S., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) ORDER ) ANTHEM BLUE CROSS BLUE ) SHIELD, and the ) DELOITTE LLP GROUP ) INSURANCE PLAN, ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________ )

This matter is before the Court for case management purposes. On March 24, 2022, Plaintiffs T.S. and J.S. filed their Complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Utah, seeking to recover benefits under an employee benefit plan. Doc. 1. The case was transferred to this district on March 8, 2023. Rule 10 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that the title of a complaint “name all the parties….” Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(a). The Fourth Circuit has recognized that “in exceptional circumstances, compelling concerns relating to personal privacy or confidentiality may warrant some degree of anonymity in judicial proceedings, including use of a pseudonym.” Doe v. Public Citizen, 749 F.3d 246, 273 (4th Cir. 2014); see also John Doe v. Lees-McRae College, et_al., No. 1:20-CV-00105-MR, 2021 WL 2673050, at *6 (W.D.N.C. June 29, 2021) (describing the analysis when a party seeks leave to proceed anonymously). In addition, Rule 5.2 allows minors to be referred to by their initials. F.R.C.P. 5.2(a). Here, the Complaint indicates that T.S. is the mother of J.S., but the pleading does not provide the full name of T.S. and this information is not otherwise immediately apparent from other portions of the record. Similarly, the Complaint does not state whether J.S. is, in fact, a minor at this time. In order to ensure compliance with the Rules, and to assist the Court with any necessary conflict screening, Plaintiffs will be directed to submit additional information in this regard. Specifically, Plaintiffs are DIRECTED TO FILE, on or before March 24, 2023, either: (1) a Notice setting forth the full

name of “T.S.” (and the full name of “J.S.” if she is not a minor), or (2) a Motion for Leave to Proceed Anonymously, with a supporting brief, along with a Notice, which may be filed under seal, setting forth the full name of “T.S.” (and the full name of “J.S.” if she is not a minor). It 1s so ordered.

Signed: March 10, 2023

W. Carleton Metcalf iy United States Magistrate Judge + AM J

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

S. v. Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/s-v-anthem-blue-cross-blue-shield-ncwd-2023.

Opinion

W. Carleton Metcalf iy United States Magistrate Judge + AM J

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack