S. Simcha Goldman v. Secretary of Defense

739 F.2d 657, 238 U.S. App. D.C. 267, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 19678, 36 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1573

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided August 10, 1984·No. 82-1723·Published·Cited by 9 cases

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellee’s suggestion for rehearing en banc has been transmitted to the full court and a majority of the judges in regular active service have not voted in favor of such rehearing. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED, by the Court, en banc, that appellee’s suggestion for rehearing en banc is denied.

Statement dissenting from denial of suggestion to hear case en banc filed by Circuit Judge STARR. Statement dissenting from denial of suggestion to hear case en banc filed by Circuit Judge GINSBURG, in which Circuit Judge SCALIA concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

ORDERED, by the Court, en banc, that appellee’s suggestion for rehearing en banc is denied.

S. Simcha Goldman v. Secretary of Defense, 739 F.2d 657, 238 U.S. App. D.C. 267, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 19678, 36 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1573 (D.C. Cir. 1984).

Pincite

739 F.2d 657 (S. Simcha Goldman v. Secretary of Defense) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Larsen v. United States Navy

486 F. Supp. 2d 11 (District of Columbia, 2007)

Goldman v. Weinberger

475 U.S. 503 (Supreme Court, 1986)

Khalsa v. Weinberger

779 F.2d 1393 (Ninth Circuit, 1985)

James L. Dronenburg v. Vice Admiral Lando Zech, Chief of Naval Personnel

746 F.2d 1579 (D.C. Circuit, 1984)

S. Simcha Goldman v. Secretary of Defense

739 F.2d 657 (D.C. Circuit, 1984)