S. S. Silver & Co. v. Cafe Charing, Inc.
This text of 264 A.D. 790 (S. S. Silver & Co. v. Cafe Charing, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to replevin property sold and installed pursuant to a conditional sales agreement, order denying motion of the plaintiff [791]*791to strike from the answer of respondent, Cafe Charing, Inc., three affirmative defenses, for insufficiency, modified on the law by striking from the ordering paragraph the words “in all respects denied ” and adding in lieu thereof the following: “ denied as to the first and second affirmative defenses and granted as to the third affirmative defense.” As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs. It was essential for the respondent to plead lack of knowledge or notice of reservation of title pursuant to the conditional sales agreement to render such reservation void, even though the agreement had not been filed in accordance with the statutes. (Murphy v. Luverne Realty Corp., 235 App. Div. 874.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
264 A.D. 790, 34 N.Y.S.2d 960, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4746, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/s-s-silver-co-v-cafe-charing-inc-nyappdiv-1942.