S. Rosenthal & Son, Inc. v. Lake Champlain Bridge Commission
377 A.2d 1327, 135 Vt. 637, 1977 Vt. LEXIS 761
This text of 377 A.2d 1327 (S. Rosenthal & Son, Inc. v. Lake Champlain Bridge Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Vermont primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
S. Rosenthal & Son, Inc. v. Lake Champlain Bridge Commission, 377 A.2d 1327, 135 Vt. 637, 1977 Vt. LEXIS 761 (Vt. 1977).
Opinion
The trial court, after purporting to make findings of fact while “declining jurisdiction,” granted a summary declaratory judgment for the defendant. No judgment order was in fact entered. The findings and conclusions below are vacated, and the cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
377 A.2d 1327, 135 Vt. 637, 1977 Vt. LEXIS 761, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/s-rosenthal-son-inc-v-lake-champlain-bridge-commission-vt-1977.