S. P. Vasile & Son v. Concrete Trans-Mix Corp.
This text of 1 A.D.2d 936 (S. P. Vasile & Son v. Concrete Trans-Mix Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements and motion granted, with $10 costs. Memorandum: Unless a proposed amended answer is clearly bad or frivolous, its sufficiency is ordinarily not to be determined upon a motion to serve it but remains to be tested upon a motion after it is served or upon a trial. (Gillette v. Allen, 269 App. Div. 441, 449; Anderson v. New York Central R. R. Co., 284 App. Div. 64.) Here the questions of agency and notice present factual issues not determinable upon the motion. All concur. (Appeal from an order of Monroe County Court denying defendant’s motion for leave to serve an amended answer.) Present — McCurn, P. J., Vaughan, Wheeler, Williams and Bastow, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 A.D.2d 936, 149 N.Y.S.2d 728, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6071, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/s-p-vasile-son-v-concrete-trans-mix-corp-nyappdiv-1956.